Changing a team is often associated with authority, plans, or Changing a team is often imagined as a top-down initiative. A new structure. A new process. A new framework.
But in practice, some of the most meaningful change starts much closer to the work, through everyday leadership choices.
In this episode of Le Podcast on Emerging Leadership, I share a conversation with John Poelstra about the ideas behind my book Changing Your Team From The Inside.
A conversation worth revisiting
This conversation was originally recorded on John’s show. John later suggested that we cross-publish it on our respective podcasts.
To do that, I had to re-listen to the episode. And I genuinely enjoyed it.
Yes, there is some ego involved in listening to yourself talk. Fittingly, ego is also one of the topics we explore in the episode.
What makes a team great
Beyond the book itself, the conversation explores broader questions such as:
- what makes a team truly great
- how leadership shows up in everyday interactions
- how individuals can influence their environment without waiting for permission
We talk about leadership not as a role or a title, but as a practice that shapes how teams work together.
Leadership from the inside
A central idea throughout the episode is that changing a team does not require being “in charge”.
It requires:
- attention to how work is done
- responsibility for how we show up
- and the willingness to experiment and learn
This is what Changing Your Team From The Inside is really about.
A final invitation
If you are looking for practical ways to improve how your team works, without waiting for a reorganization or a new mandate, this episode is a good place to start.
Give it a try, and let us know what you think.
Le Podcast – Season Two
- Playful Leadership: Helping Others Be Their Best

- Blessed, Grateful, and Human

- Build the Right Product, with Gojko Adzic

- Hiring and Diversity Without Dropping the Bar

- Leadership and Teamwork in a Crisis

- Chief of Staff: The Role, the Craft, the Community

- Belonging, Identity, and Better Hiring,

- What Software Teams Can Learn from Sporting Teams

- Agile and Open Innovation: Building the Bridge Between Tech and Business

- Radical Focus: OKRs, Cadence, and the “Seduction of the Task”

- Human-Centric Agility Coaching: The Expert Paradox and the Ideology Paradox

- The Job of an Open Leader: Context, Trust, and Growing Others

Le Podcast – Season One
- Growing as a Software Engineer: Learning, Sharing, and Impact

- Thirteen Rules for Building Strong Teams

- OKRs in Practice: Learning, Focus, and Common Pitfalls

- The Myth of 10x Engineers: Growing Beyond Technical Skills

- The Anatomy of Peace: Leadership Starts With Who You Are

- Psychological Safety: Creating Teams Where People Can Speak Up

- Leading Distributed Teams: Collaboration Across Time Zones

- Changing Your Team from the Inside: A Practitioner’s View on Leadership

- Why Shared Language Matters: How Terms Shape Collaboration

- How (Not) to Give Feedback: Responsibility, Ego, and Relationships

- Rock Stars and Superstars: Supporting Growth Without Losing Stability

- Do Cultural Differences Really Block Agile Adoption?

- How to Create Great Goals: Using OKRs to Focus on Impact

- Making Change from the Inside: Leadership Beyond Management Roles

- How to Form a Cross-Functional Team That Actually Works


















One year and a half ago, I noticed that my daughter was using an app to improve her Spanish and her English. Of course, there is an app for that! There are even several apps!
Of course, with 300 million learners, you can imagine that there are several “bronze,” “silver,” “gold” divisions running in parallel. But it seems it does not affect the behavior of the learners. I realized quickly my habit of doing three lessons per day got me immediately to the top of the first divisions, but after a few weeks, it was harder to get to the top 10, and I needed to increase my practice. So, it worked… And now, to stay in the current division, I need to do a little bit more than three lessons a day.